Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorI. Cumalioglu
dc.contributor.authorA. Ertas
dc.contributor.authorY. Ma
dc.contributor.authorT. Maxwell
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:28:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:28:42Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust, 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn2381-6872
dc.identifier.otherJFCSAU-28934#034001_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/138347
dc.description.abstractHydrogen is often considered to be the ultimate energy source for vehicles. However, if hydrogen is to fuel practical vehicles, then the development of fuel cell and hydrogen fueled engine technology must be accompanied by significant improvements in hydrogen storage techniques. Compressed hydrogen storage tanks, liquid hydrogen storage tanks, and containment systems for hydrides are examined to compare their advantages, disadvantages, and potential for onboard and stationary hydrogen storage systems. Each technique reviewed possesses specific shortcomings; thus, none can adequately satisfy the requirements of a hydrogen based economy.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleState of the Art: Hydrogen storage
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume5
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2894462
dc.journal.fristpage34001
dc.identifier.eissn2381-6910
dc.keywordsHydrogen
dc.keywordsHydrogen storage AND Storage
dc.treeJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology:;2008:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record