Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavid M. Pierce
dc.contributor.authorPaul T. Vianco
dc.contributor.authorJerome A. Regent
dc.contributor.authorSheri D. Sheppard
dc.contributor.authorJ. Mark Grazier
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:27:37Z
dc.date.copyrightMarch, 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn1528-9044
dc.identifier.otherJEPAE4-26283#011003_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137781
dc.description.abstractA general fatigue life prediction methodology, based on a unified creep plasticity damage (UCPD) model, was developed for predicting fatigue cracks in 95.5Sn–3.9Ag–0.6Cu (wt %) solder interconnects. The methodology was developed from isothermal fatigue tests using a double-lap-shear specimen. Finite element analysis model geometries, mesh densities, and assumptions were detailed for both a full model (an octant-symmetry slice of the entire ball grid array (BGA) assembly) and a submodel (the solder joint deemed most likely to fail and the surrounding package layers) to facilitate fatigue prediction. Model validation was based on the thermal mechanical fatigue of plastic BGA solder joints (250–4000 thermal cycles, −55°Cto125°C, and 10°C∕min). Metallographic cross sections were used to quantitatively measure crack development. The methodology generally underpredicted the crack lengths but, nonetheless, captured the measured crack lengths within a ±2X error band. Possible shortcomings in the methodology, including inaccurate materials properties and part geometries, as well as computational techniques, are discussed in terms of improving both the UCPD constitutive model and the fatigue life prediction methodology fidelity and decreasing the solution time.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleValidation of a General Fatigue Life Prediction Methodology for Sn–Ag–Cu Lead-Free Solder Alloy Interconnects
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume130
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2837515
dc.journal.fristpage11003
dc.identifier.eissn1043-7398
dc.keywordsSolders
dc.keywordsManufacturing
dc.keywordsFracture (Materials)
dc.keywordsFinite element analysis
dc.keywordsCycles
dc.keywordsFatigue life
dc.keywordsSolder joints
dc.keywordsBall-Grid-Array packaging
dc.keywordsFatigue cracks
dc.keywordsAlloys
dc.keywordsTemperature
dc.keywordsStress
dc.keywordsLead-free solders AND Vehicles
dc.treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record