Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorE. J. Walsh
dc.contributor.authorC. King
dc.contributor.authorR. Grimes
dc.contributor.authorA. Gonzalez
dc.contributor.authorD. Ciobanu
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:25:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:25:15Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember, 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1932-6181
dc.identifier.otherJMDOA4-27987#241_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/136563
dc.description.abstractContinuous flow offers notable advantages over batch processing for analytical applications like gene expression profiling of biological material, which demands very high processing. The technology of choice for future genetic analyzers will most likely use the polymerase chain reaction (PCR); therefore, high-throughput, high-speed PCR devices have raised enormous interest. Continuous-flow, biphasic PCR can meet these requirements but segmenting∕carrier fluids chemically compatible with the PCR are needed. The present paper compares several fluids in terms of compatibility with PCR and fluidic dynamics in a continuous, two-phase flow microfluidic device, and PCR efficiency was assessed quantitatively. The results represent the first step toward rational fluid design for biphasic continuous PCR.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleCompatibility of Segmenting Fluids in Continuous-Flow Microfluidic PCR
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Medical Devices
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2812426
dc.journal.fristpage241
dc.journal.lastpage245
dc.identifier.eissn1932-619X
dc.keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
dc.keywordsFluids AND Microfluidics
dc.treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2007:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record