Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohamed S. Ghidaoui
dc.contributor.authorDuncan A. McInnis
dc.contributor.authorDavid H. Axworthy
dc.contributor.authorMing Zhao
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:14:57Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:14:57Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary, 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn0003-6900
dc.identifier.otherAMREAD-25851#49_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/131127
dc.description.abstractHydraulic transients in closed conduits have been a subject of both theoretical study and intense practical interest for more than one hundred years. While straightforward in terms of the one-dimensional nature of pipe networks, the full description of transient fluid flows pose interesting problems in fluid dynamics. For example, the response of the turbulence structure and strength to transient waves in pipes and the loss of flow axisymmetry in pipes due to hydrodynamic instabilities are currently not understood. Yet, such understanding is important for modeling energy dissipation and water quality in transient pipe flows. This paper presents an overview of both historic developments and present day research and practice in the field of hydraulic transients. In particular, the paper discusses mass and momentum equations for one-dimensional Flows, wavespeed, numerical solutions for one-dimensional problems, wall shear stress models; two-dimensional mass and momentum equations, turbulence models, numerical solutions for two-dimensional problems, boundary conditions, transient analysis software, and future practical and research needs in water hammer. The presentation emphasizes the assumptions and restrictions involved in various governing equations so as to illuminate the range of applicability as well as the limitations of these equations. Understanding the limitations of current models is essential for (i) interpreting their results, (ii) judging the reliability of the data obtained from them, (iii) minimizing misuse of water-hammer models in both research and practice, and (iv) delineating the contribution of physical processes from the contribution of numerical artifacts to the results of waterhammer models. There are 134 refrences cited in this review article.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Review of Water Hammer Theory and Practice
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume58
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.1828050
dc.journal.fristpage49
dc.journal.lastpage76
dc.identifier.eissn0003-6900
dc.keywordsPressure
dc.keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
dc.keywordsWaves
dc.keywordsWater hammer
dc.keywordsPipes
dc.keywordsEquations
dc.keywordsShear (Mechanics)
dc.keywordsTurbulence
dc.keywordsStress
dc.keywordsValves
dc.keywordsMomentum
dc.keywordsFriction AND Pipelines
dc.treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2005:;volume( 058 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record