Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuigi Marletta
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:04:39Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:04:39Z
dc.date.copyrightDecember, 2001
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.issn0195-0738
dc.identifier.otherJERTD2-26499#304_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/125080
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the comparison of three different methods for the optimization of an air-conditioning system from an exergonomic point of view. The reference design is an all air system in typical summer operation. To optimize the system on the basis of the exergonomic approach, it was necessary to the set up the physical model (based on mass, energy, and exergy balance equations) and the economic model in order to define the decision variables and the objective function. The latter is the total cost of the whole assembly, obtained by summing up the capital costs to the running costs. The Szargut-Tsatsaronis (S-T), the Montecarlo, and the Lagrange multipliers methods are then applied with the aim of minimizing the objective function. The results may be summarized as follows: the S-T method is an iterative procedure which allows the designer to control and guide the optimization process; however, the outcome may depend on the designer’s judgment and skill. The Monte Carlo method is an almost totally automated approach; it is based on stochastic techniques and may require relatively long run time. The Lagrange multipliers method, in addition to the optimum value for the decision variables, makes it possible to deduce the sensitivity coefficients, thus providing further information about system performance. For the case under consideration, the three methods provide comparable results in terms of decision variables and minimum global costs.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Comparison of Methods for Optimizing Air-Conditioning Systems According to the Exergonomic Approach
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume123
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.1410934
dc.journal.fristpage304
dc.journal.lastpage310
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8994
dc.keywordsAir conditioning
dc.keywordsExergy
dc.keywordsDesign
dc.keywordsOptimization
dc.keywordsEquations AND Flow (Dynamics)
dc.treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record