Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIsaac Elishakoff
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:01:36Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:01:36Z
dc.date.copyrightFebruary, 2000
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.issn0003-6900
dc.identifier.otherAMREAD-926169#19_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123186
dc.description.abstractThis article summarizes the thinking of researchers and engineers world-wide on possible limitations of probabilistic methods in engineering, with particular emphasis upon structural mechanics. This question was posed over a ten year period (1988-1998) to numerous experts in the field. Written responses were received from 42, and they form the main body of this article. In an extensive discussion section, the author identifies some topics, trends, and thinking which seem to be prevalent in the responses, and supplements these with numerous related observations taken from the published literature, and other experts, who were not included in the original survey. This results in a references list with 52 entries. One ultimate conclusion reached is that reliability is much less known than many think it is.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePossible Limitations of Probabilistic Methods in Engineering
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume53
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.3097337
dc.journal.fristpage19
dc.journal.lastpage36
dc.identifier.eissn0003-6900
dc.keywordsEngineers
dc.keywordsReliability AND Structural mechanics
dc.treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2000:;volume( 053 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record