Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeter Nielsen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T23:46:09Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T23:46:09Z
dc.date.copyrightSeptember, 1995
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.issn0003-6900
dc.identifier.otherAMREAD-25695#564_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/114720
dc.description.abstractAn evaluation is given of the methods of modeling concentration profiles of suspended non-cohesive sediments in natural streams and under waves. The bottom boundary condition and the distribution models are treated separately. The merits of the simple concentration boundary condition, which has been favored by practice, are compared to those of the more general pickup function approach. Experimental evidence is presented for the inadequacy of pure gradient diffusion as a framework for modeling sediment suspension in streams and under waves. But problems arise when a significant part of the upward sediment flux is carried by vortices through distances comparable with the overall vertical scale. The performance of an alternative distribution model is discussed.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleSuspended Sediment Concentration Profiles
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume48
dc.journal.issue9
dc.journal.titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.3023145
dc.journal.fristpage564
dc.journal.lastpage569
dc.identifier.eissn0003-6900
dc.keywordsSediments
dc.keywordsWaves
dc.keywordsModeling
dc.keywordsBoundary-value problems
dc.keywordsGradients
dc.keywordsVortices AND Diffusion (Physics)
dc.treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;1995:;volume( 048 ):;issue: 009
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record