Show simple item record

contributor authorE. Eric Adams
contributor authorRandolph Schweickart
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:41:45Z
date available2017-05-08T22:41:45Z
date copyrightSeptember 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290733-9402%281987%29113%3A2%2837%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86818
description abstractMost cooling reservoirs in the U.S. employ a surface intake, but many could obtain improved performance (decreased intake temperature during summer) by using a submerged intake. Potential improvements were studied using mathematical hydrothermal modeling applied to five hypothetical reservoirs located in Augusta, Ga. For the base case reservoir—characterized by an average depth of 30 ft (9.1 m), surface area of 2,000 acres (809 ha), and areal loading of 0.99 MWt/acre—and a range of vertical mixing parameters, intake temperatures from Apr.–Oct. decreased by an average of 0.7–1.2 °F (0.4–0.7 °C) using a submerged intake as compared with a surface intake. For a range of assumed turbine performance curves and cost parameters, these temperatures yield estimated energy savings of 1,200,000–20,400,000 kWh annually and total, present valued, cost savings of $700,000–$11,600,000. Savings increase as the reservoir area and depth increase and vertical mixing decreases. In most cases, performance also improves with combined use of a surface and a submerged intake, with the former used during initial periods of the annual stratification cycle.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIntake Operation for Deep Cooling Reservoirs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1987)113:2(37)
treeJournal of Energy Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record