contributor author | Bonsang Koo | |
contributor author | Martin Fischer | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:41:15Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:41:15Z | |
date copyright | July 2000 | |
date issued | 2000 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%282000%29126%3A4%28251%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86456 | |
description abstract | This paper concludes that 4D models are a useful alternative to project scheduling tools like CPM networks and bar charts. They enable more people to understand a schedule quickly and identify potential problems. By developing a 4D model for a commercial construction project, we were able to detect the incompleteness of the original schedule, find inconsistencies in the level of detail among the schedule activities, and discover an impossible schedule sequence. We were also able to anticipate potential time-space conflicts and accessibility problems. The results of the case study show that 4D models are effective in evaluating the executability of a construction schedule. The case study also highlighted the need for improvements to 4D tools. 4D tools should include bar charts, component lists, and annotation tools in their graphical user interface. Automating schedule data preparation and 4D model generation in the design stages of a project can expedite 4D model development and use. Users need to be able to generate 4D models at multiple levels of detail and generate and evaluate alternative scenarios rapidly. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Feasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 126 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(251) | |
tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |