Show simple item record

contributor authorBonsang Koo
contributor authorMartin Fischer
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:41:15Z
date available2017-05-08T22:41:15Z
date copyrightJuly 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282000%29126%3A4%28251%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86456
description abstractThis paper concludes that 4D models are a useful alternative to project scheduling tools like CPM networks and bar charts. They enable more people to understand a schedule quickly and identify potential problems. By developing a 4D model for a commercial construction project, we were able to detect the incompleteness of the original schedule, find inconsistencies in the level of detail among the schedule activities, and discover an impossible schedule sequence. We were also able to anticipate potential time-space conflicts and accessibility problems. The results of the case study show that 4D models are effective in evaluating the executability of a construction schedule. The case study also highlighted the need for improvements to 4D tools. 4D tools should include bar charts, component lists, and annotation tools in their graphical user interface. Automating schedule data preparation and 4D model generation in the design stages of a project can expedite 4D model development and use. Users need to be able to generate 4D models at multiple levels of detail and generate and evaluate alternative scenarios rapidly.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFeasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume126
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(251)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record