Show simple item record

contributor authorSudong Ye
contributor authorRobert L. K. Tiong
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:41:11Z
date available2017-05-08T22:41:11Z
date copyrightMay 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282000%29126%3A3%28227%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86423
description abstractStrategic capital investment decisions are crucial to a business firm. The decision to invest in privately financed infrastructure projects requires careful consideration, because they are exposed to high levels of financial, political, and market risks. The project appraisal methods should incorporate analysis of these risks. A number of capital-investment decision methods can take risks into account, but each of them focuses on different factors and has its limitations. Thus, a more vigorous method is needed. A systematic classification of existing evaluation methods shows that it is possible to develop a new method—the net-present-value-at-risk (NPV-at-risk) method—by combining the weighted average cost of capital and dual risk-return methods. The evaluation of two hypothetical power projects shows that the NPV-at-risk method can provide a better decision for risk evaluation of, and investment in, privately financed infrastructure projects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNPV-at-Risk Method in Infrastructure Project Investment Evaluation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume126
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(227)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record