Show simple item record

contributor authorJames B. Pocock
contributor authorLiang Y. Liu
contributor authorMichael K. Kim
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:38:24Z
date available2017-05-08T22:38:24Z
date copyrightDecember 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281997%29123%3A4%28411%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/84667
description abstractIt has long been believed that improving project integration directly improves project performance. There has been a lack of quantitative research to directly support or negate this belief. This paper presents a method for approximating project integration, and demonstrates the impact of improved interaction on project performance. An earlier work developed a method for measuring an individual project's “degree of interaction” (DOI). Degree of interaction scores are calculated and compared for 38 projects, divided into traditional and alternative project approaches. The alternative projects have significantly higher average DOI scores than do traditional projects, indicating that they provide better opportunities for interaction. Project performance of alternative projects is better than that of traditional projects. The following four indicators of project performance are measured: cost growth, schedule growth, number of contract modifications, and modifications due to design deficiencies. The impact of improved interaction on objective performance measures is validated by studying 209 completed projects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleImpact of Management Approach on Project Interaction and Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(411)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record