Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. H. Kane
contributor authorB. L. Keshava Kumar
contributor authorR. H. Gallagher
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:44Z
date available2017-05-08T22:36:44Z
date copyrightAugust 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281992%29118%3A8%281679%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83752
description abstractConcepts involving direct approaches for continuum structural reanalysis of modified shapes employing the boundary‐element analysis (BEA) method are considered. A boundary‐element zone‐condensation technique is shown to form a very general and competitive approach for reanalysis of BEA models. Zone condensation involves the employment of multizone BEA models where the degrees of freedom and corresponding matrix coefficients in each zone are collected in partitions (also called blocks). These partitioned‐zone matrix equations can be strategically manipulated to eliminate (or condense) unchanging blocks from the overall BEA system equations, thus allowing for the subsequent assembly into an overall set of matrix equations of smaller size than when zone condensation is not employed. This approach to direct reanalysis is contrasted with strategies that utilize the well‐known Sherman‐Morrison‐Woodbury identity for the inverse of a modified matrix. Test cases are discussed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategies presented. Timing, storage, and accuracy results are included in these studies.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBoundary‐Element Direct Reanalysis for Continuum Structures
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:8(1679)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record