Show simple item record

contributor authorShyh‐Rong Kuo
contributor authorYeong‐Bin Yang
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:24Z
date available2017-05-08T22:36:24Z
date copyrightAugust 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281991%29117%3A8%281698%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83539
description abstractVlasov and Yoo's curved‐beam theories have been criticized for not applying the principles of mechanics directly to the curved beam but deriving their equations as the analogies of straight‐beam equations. Although later researchers have worked directly on the curved beam, they have inevitably introduced ambiguities in maintaining consistent orders of magnitude for the terms involved in their formulations. The reality is that not all the theories are consistent with each other. This paper intends to demonstrate that by considering a curved beam in the limit as an infinite number of infinitesimal straight beams—the only kinematic assumption—the classic straight‐beam equations can be manipulated to derive a new set of curved‐beam equations. Because the ambiguities involved in previous formulations are totally circumvented, the presented method is believed to be most convincing. For the two cases of uniform bending and uniform compression, the presented results are compared with those obtained by couples of existing theories.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNew Theory on Buckling of Curved Beams
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:8(1698)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record