Show simple item record

contributor authorPeter H. Feenstra
contributor authorRené de Borst
contributor authorJan G. Rots
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:14Z
date available2017-05-08T22:36:14Z
date copyrightApril 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281991%29117%3A4%28754%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83465
description abstractDiscrete cracks have been modeled with interface elements in which the tractions are related to the relative displacements of the crack sides. Three stages in the cracking process can be distinguished: (1) The linear‐elastic state; (2) the development state in which a tension‐softening model is used; and (3) the open‐crack state, for which five different crack‐dilatancy models have been implemented. The predictions of these crack‐dilatancy models have been compared mutually as well as with available experimental data. The discrete‐crack elements have subsequently been used in an analysis of an experiment on crack dilatancy. Again, the results for the various crack‐dilatancy models are compared. Finally, a nonlinear analysis of a moderately deep shear‐critical beam is presented including aggregate‐interlock effects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNumerical Study on Crack Dilatancy Part 2: Applications
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:4(754)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record