Show simple item record

contributor authorPeter H. Feenstra
contributor authorRené de Borst
contributor authorJan G. Rots
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:14Z
date available2017-05-08T22:36:14Z
date copyrightApril 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281991%29117%3A4%28733%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83464
description abstractDiscrete cracks have been modeled with interface elements in which the tractions are related to the relative displacements of the crack sides. Three stages in the cracking process can be distinguished: (1) The linear‐elastic state; (2) the development state in which a tension‐softening model is used; and (3) the open‐crack state. For the open‐crack state five different crack‐dilatancy models have been implemented. Explicit relations have been derived for the tangential stiffness matrices of these models. The tangential stiffness relations turn out to be nonsymmetrical; this has major consequences for the stability of the discretized mechanical system. The stability has been analyzed via eigenvalue analyses of the tangential‐stiffness matrix. Here, marked differences appear between the various models. This observation may have broad implications for the convergence behavior of assemblies of continuous and discrete elements in which these material models are utilized.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNumerical Study on Crack Dilatancy Part I: Models and Stability Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:4(733)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record