Show simple item record

contributor authorAhmet B. Kizilkanat
contributor authorDidem Oktay
contributor authorNihat Kabay
contributor authorM. Mansur Tufekci
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:34:33Z
date available2017-05-08T22:34:33Z
date copyrightFebruary 2016
date issued2016
identifier other50052408.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/82923
description abstractThe continuous increasing demand and limited availability of artificial pozzolans has led to a search for alternative supplementary cementitious materials such as natural pozzolans. This study was performed to compare the effects of pumice powder and fly ash–blended cement mortars on fresh properties, strength development, drying shrinkage, sulfate resistance, and chloride ion permeability. The experimental study was carried out on seven different paste and mortar mixtures. Mixtures were prepared by replacing 15, 25, and 35% of portland cement with pumice powder and fly ash by weight. Pumice powder adversely affected the consistency of the paste because of its porous and rough structure. On the other hand, the mortars with pumice powder achieved higher strength development and sulfate resistance, lower drying shrinkage, and chloride ion permeability compared to mortars with fly ash. Therefore, pumice powder can be used in producing sustainable, economical, and environmentally friendly cement by reducing the amount of portland cement consumed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparative Experimental Study of Mortars Incorporating Pumice Powder or Fly Ash
typeJournal Paper
journal volume28
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001407
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record