Show simple item record

contributor authorT. Y. Yang
contributor authorYuanjie Li
contributor authorSubhash C. Goel
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:25:13Z
date available2017-05-08T22:25:13Z
date copyrightJanuary 2016
date issued2016
identifier other44341448.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/80301
description abstractSteel moment frame (MF) is one of the most prevalent and well researched steel seismic force resisting systems worldwide. However, efficiency and feasibility of using MF diminishes for large spans. In this paper, a recently developed steel seismic force resisting system, named buckling-restrained knee-braced truss moment frame (BRKBTMF), is suggested as a better alternative system. The BRKBTMF uses buckling-restrained knee-braces with open web trusses. In this paper, a four-story prototype office building was designed using both MF and BRKBTMF systems. Performance of the prototype building with different span lengths was systematically studied. The results show that BRKBTMF uses less structural steel, yet it performs better with lower structural damage, repair costs, and probability of collapse as compared with the MF for all span lengths and under all earthquake intensities considered. Hence, it is concluded that BRKBTMF is a viable and effective alternative seismic force resisting system for long-span applications.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSeismic Performance Evaluation of Long-Span Conventional Moment Frames and Buckling-Restrained Knee-Braced Truss Moment Frames
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001333
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record