Show simple item record

contributor authorYang Miang Goh
contributor authorQiao Wang
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:23:32Z
date available2017-05-08T22:23:32Z
date copyrightJuly 2015
date issued2015
identifier other43930021.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79454
description abstractHorizontal lifeline system (HLLS) is one of the most widely used fall arrest systems for mitigating the risk of work-at-height in the construction and building industry. A HLLS must ensure the maximum arrest load created during a fall arrest does not exceed the capacity of the anchors and other system components. In addition, the maximum arrest force experienced by the user of the HLLS has to be kept below 6 kN (Europe, Australia, and Singapore) or 8 kN (North America). Finally, the height clearance must be sufficient to prevent the user from hitting the ground or obstacles. To achieve these safety criteria, a HLLS should be designed using appropriate calculation methods. This study evaluated 11 HLLS designs in Singapore based on common standards. A comprehensive calculation template was developed based on energy balance method to facilitate the evaluation. It was discovered that all 11 designs were not adequately endorsed or calculated. This is a potentially dangerous situation because HLLSs are usually the last line of defense for falls from height. The study demonstrated the current competency gap in design of HLLSs in Singapore. Engineers in Singapore are not adequately exposed to the concept of fall protection engineering. Thus, many of them tend to underestimate the forces involved in a fall arrest and did not spend sufficient effort to design HLLSs. It is believed that the problem is not unique to Singapore. Four measures were proposed to close this competency gap and promote sharing of best practices internationally. First, specialized training must be provided to engineers designing HLLSs. Second, it was proposed that design guides should be more detailed so as to help engineers understand what is required in a proper design of HLLSs. Third, a case-based reasoning system (CBRS) was proposed to help engineers improve their HLLS design and at the same time accumulate an international repository of HLLS designs. The CBRS will also contain a HLLS design template to facilitate designs of HLLS and other active fall protection systems. Last, it was proposed that manufacturers should make HLLS properties and detailed information on fall arrest equipment more readily available to engineers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInvestigating the Adequacy of Horizontal Lifeline System Design through Case Studies from Singapore
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000989
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record