Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert M. Clark
contributor authorJeffrey Q. Adams
contributor authorBenjamin W. Lykins, Jr.
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:23:23Z
date available2017-05-08T22:23:23Z
date copyrightJuly 1994
date issued1994
identifier other43910788.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79367
description abstractThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) is currently attempting to balance the complex trade‐offs in chemical and microbial risks associated with controlling disinfection and disinfection by‐products (D/DBP) in drinking water. In attempting to achieve this balance, the U.S. EPA will propose three rules: an information collection (ICR); an enhanced surface water treatment rule (ESWTR) and a two‐stage D/DBP rule. Controlling D/DBP will have a major impact on drinking water utilities in the United States. There are several options for D/DBP control, including moving the point of disinfection, removal of by‐products once they are found, removing precursor material or natural organic matter before it interacts with the disinfectant, or use of a disinfectant that minimizes the formation of by‐products. The least‐expensive approach to D/DBP control is to move the point of disinfection or the use of an alternative disinfectant. The least‐desirable approach is to remove disinfection by‐products once they are formed. Overall, the most effective approach to D/DBP control is to remove precursor before it reacts with the disinfectant. The choice of any given strategy is very site specific.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDBP Control in Drinking Water: Cost and Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1994)120:4(759)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record