Show simple item record

contributor authorEduardo Kausel
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:20:59Z
date available2017-05-08T22:20:59Z
date copyrightJune 1988
date issued1988
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281988%29114%3A6%281011%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78364
description abstractTransmitting boundaries are mathematical artifacts used to prevent wave reflections at the edges (or boundaries) of discrete models for infinite media under dynamic loads. Since the discrete models used are necessarily finite in size, echoes would indeed develop at the artificial boundaries if no appropriate action were taken. A number of these boundaries have been proposed in the past with recourse to various mathematical or physical principles. The present paper is concerned with an analysis of the most common and well‐known of these devices, namely the boundaries of Lysmer‐Kuhlemeyer, Engquist‐Majda, Ang‐Newmark, Smith‐Cundall, and Liao‐Wong. It is shown that they are all mathematically equivalent, and therefore, that they must have comparable wave‐absorbing attributes. Of particular interest is the proof that the Smith‐Cundall boundary (which until recently was believed to be a perfect absorber of waves when multiple reflections cannot occur) has only a limited absorbing capacity. Hence, these various transmitting boundaries are essentially alternative realizations of one and the same boundary mechanism.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLocal Transmitting Boundaries
typeJournal Paper
journal volume114
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:6(1011)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record