Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn F. McDermott
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:14:42Z
date available2017-05-08T22:14:42Z
date copyrightJune 1998
date issued1998
identifier other39974811.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/74971
description abstractAlthough entirely different in appearance, both cathedral flying buttresses and Mayan inverted-V-shaped vault ceilings are essentially leaning structures. The present study, illustrated by simple static structural analyses, demonstrates how slight but fundamental differences in the empirical developments of the common concept of a masonry leaning structure led to the construction of magnificent cathedrals in the case of flying buttresses, but a very limited architecture in the case of Mayan vault ceilings. The present study quantifies flying-buttress limit analyses, and extends one analysis to Mayan vault ceilings. Calculated quantitative relationships strongly suggest that the Mayan builders learned to position transverse wood struts reinforcing their vault ceilings and to use long ceiling stones primarily in a combined effort to ensure that the postconstruction structural behavior of the finished ceiling did not result in ceiling stones falling out, as well as to facilitate construction procedures. This is in contrast with previous studies that indicated that the practices of wood-strut reinforcing and long ceiling stones were adopted only to facilitate corbelling construction procedures.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLeaning-Structure Statics—Flying Buttresses and Mayan Vault Ceilings
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:2(75)
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;1998:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record