Show simple item record

contributor authorShigeomi Nishigaki
contributor authorJeannette Vavrin
contributor authorNoriaki Kano
contributor authorToshiro Haga
contributor authorJohn C. Kunz
contributor authorKincho Law
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:12:42Z
date available2017-05-08T22:12:42Z
date copyrightJune 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281994%29120%3A2%28421%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73730
description abstractFor many years, the Japanese construction industry has practiced several accident‐prevention activities. In spite of these safety activities, occupational accidents recur. Why? This paper offers examples of accident‐prevention activities and it reports on a safety survey of construction workers in a Japanese construction company. These examples shows that “humanware” failure accounts for a much greater portion of the underlying causes of occupational accidents. “Humanware” is defined as a function of leadership, followership, and the reciprocal interaction between the two. The safety survey had 7,955 responses; 2,588 responses reported experiencing
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHumanware, Human Error, and Hiyari‐Hat: A Template of Unsafe Symptoms
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(421)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record