Show simple item record

contributor authorKlaudia Horváth
contributor authorEduard Galvis
contributor authorManuel Gómez Valentín
contributor authorJosé Rodellar Benedé
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:10:13Z
date available2017-05-08T22:10:13Z
date copyrightMarch 2015
date issued2015
identifier other36979244.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72746
description abstractCentralized model predictive controllers are common in water systems. The control action variable can be the discharge, and the subsystems (canal pools) are modeled separately. This paper focuses on short canal pools where the interactions are stronger between canal pools. Could this procedure be better if gate openings were used as control action variables and the interconnected system were modeled for the controller? Model predictive controllers (MPCs) were developed using the discharge and the gate opening as control action variable and tested experimentally using the laboratory canal of the Technical University of Catalonia. It was found that for centralized MPCs for short canal pools, the use of gate opening as control action variable is more beneficial than discharge. Another additional advantage is that in this way it is possible to put constraints on the gate opening and the change of gate opening, which are important to the limitations of the physical system.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIs It Better to Use Gate Opening as Control Variable than Discharge to Control Irrigation Canals?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000798
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record