Show simple item record

contributor authorJunhong Park
contributor authorUdechukwu Ojiako
contributor authorTerry Williams
contributor authorMax Chipulu
contributor authorAlasdair Marshall
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:09:41Z
date available2017-05-08T22:09:41Z
date copyrightSeptember 2015
date issued2015
identifier other35899433.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72571
description abstractThis paper presents a practical tool for articulating best value criteria during the procurement of public-sector building projects in Korea. Data is obtained from sampling 180 stakeholders drawn mainly from a pool of government construction and project management experts in the Republic of Korea. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to rank emergent value criteria. The study finds that best value judgments are (1) multi-faceted assessments of stakeholder most needs; (2) mitigated by project characteristics; and (3) span functional and aesthetic considerations.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePractical Tool for Assessing Best Value at the Procurement Stage of Public Building Projects in Korea
typeJournal Paper
journal volume31
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000337
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 031 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record