Show simple item record

contributor authorShanjiang Zhu
contributor authorWoon Kim
contributor authorGang-Len Chang
contributor authorSteve Rochon
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:09:11Z
date available2017-05-08T22:09:11Z
date copyrightJune 2014
date issued2014
identifier other34770566.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72413
description abstractBoth patrolling and prepositioned strategies for allocating emergency traffic response units have been implemented in practice. To compare the performance of both response strategies, this study has conducted an efficiency comparison based on the field data from the I-495/I-95 Capital Beltway. The extensive experimental results have revealed that the effectiveness of those response strategies varies with some critical factors, including the spatial distribution of incident frequency over different times of a day, the fleet size of the response team, the congestion level, and the available detection sources. In view of the resource constraints, the study has further presented a methodology to determine the most cost-beneficial fleet size operated with the proposed strategies, considering the marginal cost and the benefit of an additional response unit on the resulting total social benefits. The analysis results with the data from the Capital Beltway could serve as the basis for highway agencies to review and optimize their incident response and management program.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesign and Evaluation of Operational Strategies for Deploying Emergency Response Teams: Dispatching or Patrolling
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000670
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record