Show simple item record

contributor authorPatrick A. Ray
contributor authorDavid W. Watkins, Jr.
contributor authorRichard M. Vogel
contributor authorPaul H. Kirshen
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:03:53Z
date available2017-05-08T22:03:53Z
date copyrightJune 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29ww%2E1943-5460%2E0000022.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70249
description abstractMuch progress has been made in the standardization of uncertainty analysis techniques for simulation modeling but less progress has been made in optimization modeling. Among the various techniques used for optimization modeling under uncertainty, robust optimization (RO) uniquely allows for evaluation and control of the various risks of poor system performance resulting from input parameter uncertainties in water-resources problems. A model formulation was developed that addresses an inadequacy in a previous RO formulation. The importance of evaluating, through postprocessing, RO model results with respect to a range of performance metrics, has been demonstrated rather than a single metric, as has been common in previous studies. An analysis of the tradeoffs between solution robustness (nearness to optimality across all scenarios) and feasibility robustness (nearness to feasibility across all scenarios) illustrates the importance of including these terms in multiobjective water resources decision models.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePerformance-Based Evaluation of an Improved Robust Optimization Formulation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000389
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record