| description abstract | In recent years, a number of evolutionary algorithms have been proposed for optimizing the design and operation of water distribution systems (WDSs). These evolutionary algorithms include genetic algorithms, ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization, the shuffled leaping frog algorithm, and differential evolution. Although there have been some comparisons made of the performance of the various algorithms, very few of these comparisons have been carried out in a completely rigorous manner. The main aim of this paper is to introduce a methodology for the rigorous comparison of various algorithms for the optimum design of water distribution systems. The methodology involves comparing the various algorithms in terms of (1) the best solution obtained; (2) the speed of convergence; and (3) the spread and consistency of the solutions obtained over a number of random starting seeds and numbers of evaluations. As a demonstration of the methodology, the techniques of genetic algorithms (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE) are applied to two frequently used WDS case studies, namely the New York Tunnels and Hanoi water networks. In addition, the techniques are applied to a real-size water distribution system consisting of 476 pipes. The results obtained show that the algorithm performances depend on the specific problem and the number of function evaluations allowed. Moreover, it is shown that correct calibration is an essential phase for a fair comparison of evolutionary algorithms. In fact, the best parameters are a function of the problem characteristics, of the objective function and of the variants in the algorithm operators. Therefore the adoption of configurations tested on slightly different versions of the algorithms can lead to quite different results. | |
