Show simple item record

contributor authorErin Towler
contributor authorBob Raucher
contributor authorBalaji Rajagopalan
contributor authorAlfredo Rodriguez
contributor authorDavid Yates
contributor authorR. Scott Summers
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:03:18Z
date available2017-05-08T22:03:18Z
date copyrightSeptember 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29wr%2E1943-5452%2E0000196.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70006
description abstractThough new water supply source development has always required planning under many forms of uncertainty, climate change presents an added dimension that may exacerbate supply and water quality challenges. Hence, new decision-support tools are needed, and in this paper an approach that incorporates the uncertainty of climate variability and change into a cost assessment framework for a municipal drinking water provider in Colorado is developed and applied. The water utility provider is developing a new source of water supply, but treatment costs are relatively high because of the advanced processes needed to treat the water to desired standards. Furthermore, the new water source has variable salinity concentrations that are not removed by any of the implemented treatment processes, requiring blending with an existing lower salinity water source. This results in an increase in the finished water salinity (as compared with the existing water source), which can have negative impacts on customer satisfaction and the life span of water-using appliances. To plan for the development of this water supply source, an approach is proposed to assess the potential treatment and residential costs associated with the blending of the new water source with an existing source under climate uncertainty. Uncertainty from climate variability is captured through a previously developed stochastic streamflow and water quality simulation method that utilizes climate change scenarios. Results show that the proposed blend strategies incur increased treatment costs and economic impacts for customers. Specifically, a 30% reduction in annual flows from climate change translates into a 12% treatment cost increase and a 22% rise in residential costs.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIncorporating Climate Uncertainty in a Cost Assessment for New Municipal Source Water
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000150
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record