Show simple item record

contributor authorJeremy L. Schroeder
contributor authorMichael J. Demetsky
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:01:56Z
date available2017-05-08T22:01:56Z
date copyrightSeptember 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000314.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69273
description abstractDynamic message signs (DMS) are used in conjunction with other media to communicate traffic conditions, general information, and recommended diversion strategies to motorists. This study uses loop detector data from Richmond, Virginia, to estimate diversion rates attributable to DMS advisory messages on Interstate 95 where Interstate 295 is available as a comparable alternate route, thus evaluating DMS effectiveness in traffic diversion without major concerns of added trip time or quality of the alternate route. The impacts of existing message strategies are investigated to determine those messages that maximize diversion for specific circumstances. Analysis is performed for various message types for the scenario of an incident on the primary freeway, I-95, encouraging diversion of I-95 traffic to an alternate route (I-295). Results show trends where the usage of particular words in messages is more effective than others in causing diversion, and recommendations are made to create a more effective message that promotes diversion.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleData Analysis of Diversion and Dynamic Message Signs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000270
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record