| contributor author | Christopher A. Trautner | |
| contributor author | Rasko P. Ojdrovic | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:00:59Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:00:59Z | |
| date copyright | April 2014 | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29st%2E1943-541x%2E0000912.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/68807 | |
| description abstract | ASCE 7-10 allows the design of the main wind force resisting system (MWFRS) of buildings with a mean roof height of less than 18.3 m (60 ft) by using either the directional procedure of Chapter 27 or the envelope procedure of Chapter 28 (sometimes referred to as the all heights and low-rise procedures, respectively). These two procedures were developed based on research that used very different methodologies to develop enveloped wind loads. As a result, the two methods may predict very different wind loads and subsequent structural behavior. This paper presents motivation for the research and a comparison of the structural demands calculated by using the two procedures; identifies some situations for which the low-rise procedures may give unconservative MWFRS member loads, proposes changes to the provisions, and identifies avenues for future research. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Comparison of Directional and Envelope Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7 | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 140 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000868 | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |