Show simple item record

contributor authorChristopher A. Trautner
contributor authorRasko P. Ojdrovic
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:00:59Z
date available2017-05-08T22:00:59Z
date copyrightApril 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29st%2E1943-541x%2E0000912.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/68807
description abstractASCE 7-10 allows the design of the main wind force resisting system (MWFRS) of buildings with a mean roof height of less than 18.3 m (60 ft) by using either the directional procedure of Chapter 27 or the envelope procedure of Chapter 28 (sometimes referred to as the all heights and low-rise procedures, respectively). These two procedures were developed based on research that used very different methodologies to develop enveloped wind loads. As a result, the two methods may predict very different wind loads and subsequent structural behavior. This paper presents motivation for the research and a comparison of the structural demands calculated by using the two procedures; identifies some situations for which the low-rise procedures may give unconservative MWFRS member loads, proposes changes to the provisions, and identifies avenues for future research.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Directional and Envelope Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000868
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record