Show simple item record

contributor authorD. Mitchell
contributor authorW. D. Cook
contributor authorY. Deng
contributor authorJ. Liu
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:00:55Z
date available2017-05-08T22:00:55Z
date copyrightMarch 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29st%2E1943-541x%2E0000893.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/68788
description abstractTwo series of full-scale specimens were constructed and tested under pure axial load to investigate the effectiveness of confinement provided by headed bars. One series consisted of columns and the other series represented boundary elements in shear walls. Each series consisted of five specimens that included a specimen without any confinement, a specimen with closed ties, a specimen with seismic hoops and crossties, a specimen with closed hoops and headed bars replacing the crossties, and a specimen that had all of the transverse reinforcement replaced by headed bars. It was concluded that headed bars provided a viable solution when used to replace crossties, offering similar confinement. In these monotonically loaded tests, it was also found that headed bars could be used to replace entirely the hoops and the crossties, offering similar confinement effects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConfinement of Columns and Wall Boundary Elements Using Headed Bars
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000850
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record