Show simple item record

contributor authorLeo Václavek
contributor authorI.-Hong Chen
contributor authorPavel Marek
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:58:13Z
date available2017-05-08T21:58:13Z
date copyrightFebruary 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29sc%2E1943-5576%2E0000074.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67723
description abstractPowerful computers on each designer’s desk, improvements in simulation technique, and advances in the reliability assessment theory make it possible to consider a transition from prescriptive concepts, such as partial factor design (PFD), to fully probabilistic concepts applicable in design practice, such as the feasible simulation-based reliability assessment (SBRA) method. Using a pilot example, the main differences between the PFD assessment procedure and SBRA procedure are demonstrated and described. Attention is focused on the substance of individual steps starting with the assignment (including a representation of loading, mechanical, and geometrical properties of the structure and characteristics of imperfections) and concluding the comparison with safety limits expressed vis-à-vis PFD by a ratio of demand and capacity (to be less than 1.0) and regarding SBRA by comparing the probability of failure
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSafety Assessment of a Steel Frame Using LRFD and SBRA Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue1
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000028
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2010:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record