Show simple item record

contributor authorPhilip Berke
contributor authorGavin Smith
contributor authorWard Lyles
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:57:38Z
date available2017-05-08T21:57:38Z
date copyrightMay 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29nh%2E1527-6996%2E0000105.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67461
description abstractState mitigation plans play a critical role in supporting disaster loss reduction and long-term resiliency of human communities. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all states to prepare mitigation plans. Based on six principles of plan quality, we content analyzed a sample of 30 coastal state plans to determine how well they support mitigation. Findings indicate that although plans scored moderate to low for all plan quality principles, plan quality has modestly improved over the past decade. In addition, some states scored low for one principle, which can undermine implementation of otherwise high-scoring plans for the remaining principles. Recommendations are offered on how plan quality evaluation can be used to guide and monitor state development of hazard mitigation plans.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePlanning for Resiliency: Evaluation of State Hazard Mitigation Plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act
typeJournal Paper
journal volume13
journal issue2
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2012:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record