Show simple item record

contributor authorYaolin Yi
contributor authorMartin Liska
contributor authorAbir Al-Tabbaa
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:56:32Z
date available2017-05-08T21:56:32Z
date copyrightFebruary 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000849.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67207
description abstractThis paper addresses the use of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and reactive magnesia (MgO) blends for soil stabilization, comparing them with GGBS-lime blends and Portland cement (PC) for enhanced technical performance. A range of tests were conducted to investigate the properties of stabilized soils, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), permeability, and microstructural analyses by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The influence of GGBS:MgO ratio, binder content, soil type, and curing period were addressed. The UCS results revealed that GGBS-MgO was more efficient than GGBS-lime as a binder for soil stabilization, with an optimum MgO content in the range of 5–20% of the blends content, varying with binder content and curing age. The 28-day UCS values of the optimum GGBS-MgO mixes were up to almost four times higher than that of corresponding PC mixes. The microstructural analyses showed the hydrotalcite was produced during the GGBS hydration activated by MgO, although the main hydration products of the GGBS-MgO stabilized soils were similar to those of PC.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleProperties of Two Model Soils Stabilized with Different Blends and Contents of GGBS, MgO, Lime, and PC
typeJournal Paper
journal volume26
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000806
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record