Show simple item record

contributor authorMichelle R. Nokken
contributor authorTarek Salloum
contributor authorAllen Idle
contributor authorLuis A. Martinez Ramos
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:56:20Z
date available2017-05-08T21:56:20Z
date copyrightJanuary 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000771.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67134
description abstractFly ash is becoming increasing used in concrete structures for enhanced durability. This research investigated two types of fly ash in conjunction with four cements. The cements were both high and low alkali, with and without blended silica fume. Mortar and concrete mixtures were prepared containing from 0 to 80% fly ash replacement. Standardized tests were performed for compressive strength, as well as sulfate, chloride, and alkali resistance. High replacement levels performed relatively well in sulfate and alkali resistance, but poorly in regards to compressive strength and chloride resistance. From a durability perspective, 40% fly ash replacement was found to have the best overall performance from these mixtures. Standardized test methods are comparative by nature, and as such cannot replicate the complexity of concrete mixtures and their exposure conditions; higher replacements have been successfully used in practice.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStandardized Testing for Determining the Durability of High-Volume Fly Ash Mixtures
typeJournal Paper
journal volume26
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000736
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record