Show simple item record

contributor authorJennifer S. Shane
contributor authorSusan M. Bogus
contributor authorKeith R. Molenaar
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:39Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:39Z
date copyrightJuly 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000171.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66197
description abstractOwners of water/wastewater facilities can choose from several project delivery methods, including the traditional design-bid-build method or an alternative design-build method. When choosing a project delivery method, the owner should consider both the project goals as well as the performance of different project delivery methods. Detailed data on project delivery performance allow owners to match project goals, such as time savings, with project delivery methods. Detailed data on project delivery performance do not currently exist for the water/wastewater sector. Through a survey of water/wastewater facility owners, data were collected on 31 design-build projects and sixty-nine design-bid-build projects. A statistical analysis of the data determined that schedule growth for design-build projects was half that of design-bid-build projects; more design-build projects finished at or below budget; and both project delivery methods produced projects of comparable quality. Although this is the first study of its type in the water/wastewater sector, these results are consistent with similar studies conducted in the building and transportation sectors.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMunicipal Water/Wastewater Project Delivery Performance Comparison
typeJournal Paper
journal volume29
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000139
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record