Show simple item record

contributor authorMin Liu
contributor authorGlenn Ballard
contributor authorWilliam Ibbs
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:30Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:30Z
date copyrightOctober 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000089.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66115
description abstractDifferent types of flow variation and how they affect construction project performance have been studied by previous researchers. One aspect that has not been well researched is how work flow variation and labor productivity are related in construction practice. To study that issue, 134 weeks of project production data were collected and analyzed to explore this relationship. Labor productivity was found to be positively correlated with Percent Plan Complete (PPC), a measure of work flow variation. The relationship between productivity and the ratio of total task completion to planned tasks, weekly workload, weekly work output, and weekly work hours was also studied, and no significant correlation was found. The results suggest that productivity is not improved by completing as many tasks as possible regardless of the plan, nor from increasing workload, work output, or the number of work hours expended. In contrast, productivity does improve when work flow is made more predictable. These findings can help project managers focus on actual drivers of productivity. It can also help consulting companies pinpoint responsibility for productivity losses in claims.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleWork Flow Variation and Labor Productivity: Case Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000056
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record