| contributor author | Paul Murphy | |
| contributor author | Andre Marquette | |
| contributor author | Danny Reible | |
| contributor author | Gregory V. Lowry | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:54:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:54:22Z | |
| date copyright | July 2006 | |
| date issued | 2006 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9372%282006%29132%3A7%28787%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66020 | |
| description abstract | In situ capping manages contaminated sediment on-site without creating additional exposure pathways associated with dredging, e.g., sediment resuspension, and potential human exposure during transport, treatment, or disposal of dredged material. Contaminant mass is not immediately removed in sediment capping, which creates concerns over its long-term effectiveness. Groundwater seepage can also decrease the effectiveness of in situ capping. This study compares the effectiveness of commercially available sorbents that can be used to amend sand caps to improve their ability to prevent contaminant migration from the sediments into the bioactive zone. Amendments evaluated include coke, activated carbon, and organic-rich soil. The properties relevant to advective-dispersive transport through porous media (sorption, porosity, dispersivity, and bulk density) are measured for each material, and then used as inputs to a numerical model to predict the flux of 2,4,5-polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) through a sand cap amended with a thin | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Predicting the Performance of Activated Carbon-, Coke-, and Soil-Amended Thin Layer Sediment Caps | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 132 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Environmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:7(787) | |
| tree | Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |