Show simple item record

contributor authorPaul Murphy
contributor authorAndre Marquette
contributor authorDanny Reible
contributor authorGregory V. Lowry
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
date copyrightJuly 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282006%29132%3A7%28787%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66020
description abstractIn situ capping manages contaminated sediment on-site without creating additional exposure pathways associated with dredging, e.g., sediment resuspension, and potential human exposure during transport, treatment, or disposal of dredged material. Contaminant mass is not immediately removed in sediment capping, which creates concerns over its long-term effectiveness. Groundwater seepage can also decrease the effectiveness of in situ capping. This study compares the effectiveness of commercially available sorbents that can be used to amend sand caps to improve their ability to prevent contaminant migration from the sediments into the bioactive zone. Amendments evaluated include coke, activated carbon, and organic-rich soil. The properties relevant to advective-dispersive transport through porous media (sorption, porosity, dispersivity, and bulk density) are measured for each material, and then used as inputs to a numerical model to predict the flux of 2,4,5-polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) through a sand cap amended with a thin
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePredicting the Performance of Activated Carbon-, Coke-, and Soil-Amended Thin Layer Sediment Caps
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:7(787)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record