Show simple item record

contributor authorSai On Cheung
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:53:58Z
date copyrightAugust 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000055.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65789
description abstractAlternative dispute resolution techniques as means to speedily and economically resolve certain types of disputes have been well recognized. In this regard, some jurisdictions have opted to use mandatory adjudication to deal with construction, in particular payment-related disputes. The situation in Hong Kong is a bit different. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region aspires to make Hong Kong a hub for arbitration and mediation services for the region. Voluntary mediation has been introduced in the civil procedures rules of the High Court as part of the newly launched Civil Justice Reform. Adverse cost order is used to discourage “refusal to mediate” and “failing to attempt to mediate.” While the new measures that came into effect on April 2, 2009, sound sensible, a better picture on the actual impacts will unfold as more cases reach the Court. Nonetheless, the cost sanction may be able to make the voluntary use of mediation less voluntary.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConstruction Mediation Landscape in the Civil Justice System in Hong Kong
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000022
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2010:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record