Show simple item record

contributor authorO. Castro-Orgaz
contributor authorJ. V. Giráldez
contributor authorJ. L. Ayuso
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:50:41Z
date available2017-05-08T21:50:41Z
date copyrightMarch 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29hy%2E1943-7900%2E0000167.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63972
description abstractDoubts have been expressed about the validity of the critical depth defined in terms of the minimum specific energy head of the free-surface streamline when dealing with developing open-channel flows. This note examines the two approaches for defining critical flow, that based on the minimum specific energy of the free-surface streamline and that based on the mean energy head of the whole flow section. Large differences for the dimensionless critical depths are obtained with the two methods due to each critical depth proving to be a different control point on the free-surface profile. It is argued that both methods are different alternatives, although the critical depth concept was different in each case. Theoretical support to critical flow computations based on the free streamline is provided. An alternative approach for computing the discharge characteristics of broad-crested weirs based on the energy loss inside the boundary layer is also proposed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCritical Depth Relationships in Developing Open-Channel Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000142
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record