Show simple item record

contributor authorZhongbo Yu
contributor authorHuiyi Cai
contributor authorChuanguo Yang
contributor authorQin Ju
contributor authorDi Liu
contributor authorAili Sun
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:50:07Z
date available2017-05-08T21:50:07Z
date copyrightApril 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29he%2E1943-5584%2E0000892.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63753
description abstractThis study evaluates the performance of three Budyko-type equations (Fu’s equation, Turc-Pike’s equation, and Milly’s equation) in modeling annual evapotranspiration in 32 watersheds covering both humid and arid regions in Northern China. Daily meteorological data and monthly runoff data are used to calculate potential and actual evapotranspirations in the 32 watersheds. The results show that the Budyko-type equations are adaptive in predicting annual evapotranspiration over most of the watersheds, and Fu’s and Turc-Pike’s equations perform better than Milly’s. In addition, the validity of the framework by Koster and Suarez in predicting the evapotranspiration deviation ratio (EDR) (i.e., the ratio of the standard deviation of evapotranspiration to the standard deviation of rainfall) based on Fu’s and Ture-Pike’s equations is also examined. Given the unexpected Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values (
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAdaptivity of Budyko Hypothesis in Evaluating Interannual Variability of Watershed Water Balance in Northern China
typeJournal Paper
journal volume19
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000862
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record