Show simple item record

contributor authorH. Randolph Thomas
contributor authorGary R. Smith
contributor authorR. Martin Ponderlick
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:49:29Z
date available2017-05-08T21:49:29Z
date copyrightDecember 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281992%29118%3A4%28767%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63509
description abstractThis paper describes the important aspects of construction law that relate to differing‐site‐condition (DSC) disputes and presents a guide for contractors and contract administrators to resolve contract disputes based on the DSC contract clause. Based on research of more than 75 appellate decisions, the paper summarizes the remarkable consistency in case law decisions. Careful examination reveals that courts follow consistent patterns of inquiry. These patterns have been defined in an easy‐to‐follow flowchart describing the particular inquiry. A narrative containing numerous case citations and synopses accompanies each inquiry. An example, based on an actual case, is included to illustrate the use of the flowchart. The flowchart was tested using 10 other cases, and the outcome using the flowchart was the same as the judicial decision in each instance.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResolving Contract Disputes Based on Differing‐Site‐Condition Clause
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:4(767)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record