Show simple item record

contributor authorDe-Fu Liu
contributor authorBo-Tao Xie
contributor authorHua-Jun Li
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:48:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:48:50Z
date copyrightJanuary 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29he%2E1943-5584%2E0000307.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/63159
description abstractWith an increasing tendency of the flood disaster frequency and intensity in China, risk analysis of design flood volume for the Three Gorges Dam Project (TGP) should be of paramount importance for about one-half of the population and gross domestic product in China. How to predict the floods of Yangtze River with high precision is always a difficult problem, for the vast drainage basin and numerous tributaries. After a brief introduction of extreme value distribution and compound extreme value distribution, the TGP design flood volume predicted by the Chinese Hydraulic Design Code (CHDC) recommended annual maximum data sampling based Pearson type III extrapolation method is compared with the stochastic simulation technique based on the important sampling procedure (ISP) and the multivariate compound extreme value distribution (MCEVD), respectively. Comparison results show that the 100-year joint return period of the 3-day flood volume predicted by ISP and MCEVD is greater than 1,000-year return volume predicted by CHDC recommended method.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesign Flood Volume of the Three Gorges Dam Project
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000287
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record