Show simple item record

contributor authorRalf Peek
contributor authorArash Nobahar
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:45:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:45:24Z
date copyrightAugust 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29gm%2E1943-5622%2E0000162.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/61550
description abstractTwo types of models, coupled and uncoupled, are currently used to determine the extent to which it is necessary to bury subsea pipelines deeper than the maximum expected depth of ice gouges. In the uncoupled model, the soil is modeled by nonlinear Winkler springs attached to the pipe at one end, with the subgouge displacement imposed at the other end of the springs. In coupled models, the soil is modeled as a three-dimensional (3D) continuum, simultaneously capturing the processes of gouging (with associated very large deformations) and the pipeline resisting the soil displacements. This paper pinpoints the main reason for differences in predictions between the coupled and uncoupled model. It is not the coupling errors (attributable to directional coupling between Winkler springs in the axial, lateral, and vertical directions, and slice-to-slice coupling), but, rather, the superposition error, which arises in the uncoupled model by adding the soil displacements attributable to the load the pipe exerts on the soil to the subgouge deformations, despite the strongly nonlinear behavior of the soil.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIce Gouging over a Buried Pipeline: Superposition Error of Simple Beam-and-Spring Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue4
journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000150
treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record