Show simple item record

contributor authorJames E. Palumbo
contributor authorLinfield C. Brown
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:42:44Z
date available2017-05-08T21:42:44Z
date copyrightMarch 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29ei%2E1943-5541%2E0000006.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60259
description abstractThe overall performance of 18 commonly used reaeration rate coefficient prediction equations was evaluated using statistical metrics of prediction accuracy and bias by comparing predicted reaeration coefficients to a database of values measured using gas tracer techniques. Adapting a commonly applied concept, predictive equations were evaluated in discrete regions of the velocity-depth space. Results indicate that rarely is there a single best prediction equation in a given velocity-depth region, rather there usually is a group of statistically indistinguishable top-performing equations. Also, no single reaeration equation performed well over all hydraulic conditions. Prediction equations, which include slope as a variable are more accurate and have lower bias than those that do not. However, even the top-performing equations exhibited large prediction errors of at least 40–50% and exceeded 100% in some regions. This level of error in predicting reaeration rate coefficients will continue to have a major impact on the uncertainty of dissolved oxygen forecasts from receiving water quality models.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAssessing the Performance of Reaeration Prediction Equations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000799
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record