Show simple item record

contributor authorHuyen T. Dang
contributor authorRoberto M. Narbaitz
contributor authorTakeshi Matsuura
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:41:43Z
date available2017-05-08T21:41:43Z
date copyrightOctober 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29ee%2E1943-7870%2E0000262.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/59665
description abstractMembrane cleaning is critical to the operation of membrane processes. This paper studies the impact of using four different types of bench-scale membrane systems to assess the effectiveness of different cleaning steps after the filtration of colored river water. The systems are a stirred ultrafiltration (UF) cell, a SEPA cell, a small cross-flow (CF) cell, and a six-CF-cell-in-parallel system. The effect of cleaning frequency was also investigated. The comparison was implemented in terms of flux recovery, solute removal, solute resistance removal, and changes of contact angles. The stirred UF cell was only reliable and comparable in terms of flux and flux recovery results. The six-cell-in-parallel system requires further development due to their much lower flux. For cleaning at 30-min intervals, the cleaning efficiency of membranes was similar for the three CF systems. For cleaning intervals of 2 and 4 h did not statistically affect the flux recovery for the stirred UF cell and SEPA cell. There was some irreversible fouling that could not be restored completely by clean-in-place method even with rigorous chemical treatment.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEvaluation of Apparatus for Membrane Cleaning Tests
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000254
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record