Show simple item record

contributor authorBrian E. Reed
contributor authorMichael D. Bagby
contributor authorRonald L. Vaughan, Jr.
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:41:36Z
date available2017-05-08T21:41:36Z
date copyrightJanuary 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282004%29130%3A1%2812%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/59597
description abstractHollow fiber (HF) and tubular membranes were installed at a dental clinic and used to treat dental wastewater (DWW) over a six-month period. Both membranes rejected the vast majority of the Hg (Tubular: 99% rejection and permeate Hg=20.8 μg/L; HF: 97% rejection and permeate Hg=6.6 μg/L). Permeate Hg concentration and flux were not adversely affected by concentrating the DWW indicating that the system can be operated indefinitely. Biological growth blocked the openings of the HF lumens necessitating frequent maintenance. The tubular membrane with its large channel diameter (2.53 cm versus 1 mm for the HF) did not experience channel blockage. Given the small volume of DWW that is produced at a dental facility (≈3 L/d), the packing density and footprint of the membrane unit are not a major concern, thus, HF module offers no real advantage over the tubular module. Additionally, the increase maintenance that is required with the HF module is a distinct disadvantage making the tubular module better suited for dental facilities.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMicrofiltration of a Dental Wastewater for Hg Removal: Clinic Demonstration
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:1(12)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record