Show simple item record

contributor authorR. Edward Minchin Jr.
contributor authorXiaoxiao Li
contributor authorRaja R. Issa
contributor authorGary G. Vargas
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:40:03Z
date available2017-05-08T21:40:03Z
date copyrightOctober 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000753.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58904
description abstractThe choice of construction delivery system is one of the most important decisions that a public highway agency will make with regard to a highway, bridge, or transit construction project. Although several research projects have been conducted on the subject of comparing costs and project duration, there has been no study that statistically analyzes these factors specifically for transportation projects, much less one that eliminates the largest variable of all: different public agencies. The objective of the research reported in this paper was to determine which of two delivery methods, design-bid-build (DBB) and design-build (DB), delivers highway and bridge construction projects at the lowest cost and in the shortest time period, and to back up the findings with a rigorous statistical analysis of the data. Data were taken from the databases of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and arithmetically and statistically compared through Levene’s test, the independent samples t-test, the Welch unequal variances t-test, and the Mann-Whitney
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Cost and Time Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Delivery Systems in Florida
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000746
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record