Show simple item record

contributor authorYujie Lu
contributor authorQingbin Cui
contributor authorYun Le
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:39:58Z
date copyrightAugust 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000689.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58843
description abstractGreen principles have been increasingly incorporated into planning, design, construction, and maintenance processes in the engineering and construction industry. Along with the growth of the green initiative, going green not only demonstrates corporate social responsibility, but may yield significant economic benefits. This study compares financial performance between green and conventional firms in the engineering and construction industry. A total of 22 sample companies used in this empirical analysis are categorized into two groups—green versus conventional firms—in accordance with Engineering News Record and Newsweek green company lists. Two groups are compared in terms of short-term financial performance, long-term economic value, and market value. The analysis shows that green firms outperform conventional firms on return on equity (17.4 versus 8.2%) and economic value added margin (0.35 versus
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTurning Green to Gold in the Construction Industry: Fable or Fact?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000676
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record