Show simple item record

contributor authorFengwei Li
contributor authorKok Kwang Phoon
contributor authorXiuli Du
contributor authorMingju Zhang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:52Z
date available2017-05-08T21:39:52Z
date copyrightMarch 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000612.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58773
description abstractThe analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach has been widely used in multicriteria decision making (MCDM). It is very difficult to meet the consistency requirement of a comparison matrix (CM) in AHP. The authors analyze the reasons for inconsistent CM in AHP and propose an improved AHP (IAHP) to improve CM consistency by using a sorting and ranking methodology. The results of comparing AHP with IAHP by MATLAB simulation show that IAHP is more suitable for solving MCDM problems when the number of elements or factors is 5 or more in MCDM. A case study is presented to illustrate the performance of IAHP when applied to risk identification during an open-cut subway construction. The application results show that IAHP is superior to AHP in terms of CM consistency, information extraction effectiveness, and convenience in practical implementation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleImproved AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record